Home     Log in

Archive for October 23rd, 2008

What About Mesothelioma Prevention Legal System?

October 23rd, 2008 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

A lot has been said about what is, what lawyers can do and how can victims sue asbestos companies. It has also being explained in great detail what are the benefits for lawyers, the suing process and the amounts a victim can obtain when winning the case. What about asbestos companies? Were they really unaware of this kind of cancer? What about the government? Did it really have no knowledge whatsoever about what was going on? Shouldn´t this example warn us about how fragile certain legal structures are in practice and how we must fight for our rights?

I think that the best approach when dealing with this kind of issues is asking ourselves what have we done ourselves to promote preventive measures in order to avoid further cases. We do not certainly have the power to influence asbestos companies on our own but as active members of society we can fight for our rights and make extensive our concerns to local government authorities.

Human nature is selfish a lot of times and unfortunately personal interests tend to prevail in many situations over moral aspects. That´s why, it´s so important to make some kind of pressure inside the legal system in order to promote protective laws. Mesothelioma, it´s just another case of many others. There are a lot of similar cases where human lifes were spoiled because of money. That´s not right. If we want to change how things are working right now we have to fight for what we believe is right ASAP. No one is going to spend time and dedicate efforts for something that does not cash into revenue. That´s exactly what´s going on with cases right now. Since a lot of money is involved in the whole legal process, the pieces move really fast. Should this kind of reward always be our source of inspiration?

[ Submitted with ArticleSubmitter Pro - articlesubmitterpro.info" target="_new articlesubmitterpro.info ]

About The Author
Nick Collebechi has a vast experience writing informative and self minded articles. If you liked this article please visit paraisovirtual.com.ar/.html” target=”_new www.paraisovirtual.com.ar/.html and learn more about this disease and ways to fight it.

Tags:

Related posts

Tags:

New Treatments For Prostate Cancer

October 23rd, 2008 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

Researchers and doctors are always looking for more effective and alternative treatments for . New treatment research is going on in several areas at present.

PROSTATE CANCER - NEW TREATMENT BY RADIOTHERAPY

Research is continuing to try and improve technology and techniques to allow radiotherapy to the prostate gland to be more effective and to have fewer side effects. One way is to reduce the amount of radiation received by normal organs (bladder, bowel etc) and this has been improving over the last few years with better machines and techniques such as “conformal radiotherapy” and “IMRT”.

Work is also being carried out on combining brachytherapy with external therapy to allow some of the benefits of brachytherapy (fewer side effects, higher overall dose to the ) to be used for men with more advanced without compromising the chance of cure.

NEW HORMONE THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER

Some newer hormone treatments have fewer side effects than older hormone based drugs. Some are also felt to be more effective. All the time researchers are testing to try and find the best hormone tablets or injections for use in .

Other research is going on to try and work out the best time to give hormone treatment in and whether it is best to combine this treatment with other types of treatments such as or radiotherapy. Trials are currently being run to answer these questions and the results should be available in the next few years.

IMPROVEMENTS IN CHEMOTHERAPY TREATMENT FOR PROSTATE CANCER

In the past did not respond very well to drugs. However now there are newer drugs which are more powerful against and these have started to be used with more frequency in late which has already spread to other organs and which has become resistant to hormone treatments. The best drug found so far is Docetaxel, a new type of drug. It has several side effects including hair loss, nausea and risk of infection. Doctors are now looking to see if Docetaxel would work even better as a combination with other drugs.

USE OF BISPHOSPHONATE DRUGS FOR PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT

These are a group of drugs which are most often used in treating osteoporosis. It has been recently found that they can also help reduce pain associated with cancer deposits or secondaries in the bones. They may also help reduce the risk of these abnormal bones from breaking or fracturing, by slowing down the damage caused to the bone by the cancer.

Research is ongoing to look at which of these drugs is the best for treating with bone disease and when the best time to start treatment with these drugs is.

ALTERNATIVE TO SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF EARLY PROSTATE CANCER

There are 2 new treatments which are being researched as an alternative to surgery for some men with localised . Both options would not require a general anaesthetic (you would not need to be put to sleep) making them lower risk. Both treatments also have fewer side effects than radical surgery (“prostatectomy”). However neither has been in use long enough to know if it will prevent from coming back as effectively as standard treatments (surgery and radiotherapy).

Cryotherapy is the killing of cancer cells by freezing them. Needles are inserted into the prostate gland under local anaesthetic and liquid nitrogen is passed along them to freeze the prostate and the cancer cells within it. Currently it is being used for men whose has come back despite a first more conventional treatment and so is only being trialled for use as a first treatment option.

HIFU stands for high frequency ultrasound. Here ultrasound waves are directed to where there are cancer cells and are these are used to heat them up, thus killing them. In the ultrasound probe would be put into the back passage and from here ultrasound waves would be fired towards the prostate gland. The results so far have been good in that the treatment is safe and effective.

NEW TREATMENTS FOR PROSTATE CANCER IN VERY EARLY STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT

There are a number of alternative treatments which are still at a highly experimental stage of development. Gene therapy aims to replace the faulty genes in cancer cells with good ones which would allow the cell to self destruct if it felt it had become too mutated. (Cancer cells have lost this self destruct ability and continue to grow and divide despite having many abnormalities which would normally force the cell to die.) Vaccine treatment looks at ways of making the bodies own immune system recognise and kill cancerous sells. Endothelin blockers are a new type of drug treatment which works by preventing the cells to grow.

Many people may have heard that Vitamin D is being used in the treatment of however this therapy is in the very early experimental stages and is no where near being used in clinics as a . Vitamin D has been reported to block receptors on cells thereby slowing the rate of their growth but there is NO clinical evidence that this is in fact the case. Some researchers claim that the active form of Vitamin D slows the growth of but as yet this has only been tested on mice and other small animals.

Beta-sitosterol is a herbal remedy that people have started to associate with treatment. This natural plant fat has apparently been proven effective for the treatment of an enlarged prostate but not necessarily . According to research Beta-sitosterol MAY help to prevent the emergence of but this has not been clinically proven yet.

Adrian Jones writes on several forms of cancer. Further information is available on his website dealing with justabout-prostatecancer.com/ and justabout-prostatecancer.com/new_treatments/new_prostate_cancer_treatments_index.php New treatments for Prostate Cancer. You may reprint this if you include this credit.

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Tags: , ,

Reducing Risk Factors for Breast Cancer

October 23rd, 2008 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

Second only to is the leading cause of death among women in the United States. Only with early detection and effective treatment will it be likely to reduce the number of women who die from each year.

There are some factors that are known to decrease a woman’s risk for developing . Among those factors are SERMs, prophylactic , aromatase inhibitors, prophylactic oophorectomy, and exercise. It is not known if factors such as abortion, diet, environment, second hand smoke, smoking, or statins can increase a woman’s risk factors for .

Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators, or SERMs are drugs acting similar to estrogen on some tissues in the body such as bones, while blocking estrogen effects on other tissues. Certain SERMs have been shown in studies to lower the risk for developing for women at risk for developing this disease. Unfortunately there can be side affects with SERM drugs such as endometrial cancer, blood clots in veins and in the lungs, and stroke. A woman must discuss with her health care provider both benefits and risks of taking SERMs.

If there is a family history of removal of both breasts, or prophylactic , may reduce the risk of developing for a woman. Careful consideration must be given before a woman makes a decision to have prophylactic . It is important that risk assessments and counseling are undergone before making such a decision. Women who have prophylactic may develop anxieties and depression as well as concern about their body image.

Aromatase inhibitors decrease the body’s estrogen and can lower the risk of in postmenopausal women. Most of a woman’s estrogen is made outside the ovaries from androgen (another hormone) in postmenopausal women. Aromatase inhibitors work by stopping the action of the enzyme aromatase which converts androgens into estrogens. Negative side effects from taking aromatase inhibitors include decreased bone density and effects on a person’s brain function such as talking, memory, and learning.

Decreasing the amount of estrogen made by the body with the removal of both ovaries, or prophylactic oophorectomy may reduce a woman’s risk for developing . Drugs may also be given to decrease the amount of estrogen produced by the ovaries. However, the sudden drop in estrogen may cause symptoms of menopause to occur such as hot flashes, trouble sleeping, anxiety, depression, vaginal dryness, loss of bone density or lack of interest in sex.

Hormone levels may reduce if a woman exercises four or more hours per week and can lower the risk for . Exercise effectively reducing risk is greater in younger women of low weight or normal weight. Exercise should be safe and the risk of injury to bones and muscles must be taken into consideration.

Abortion has not been shown to increase a woman’s risk of developing . Studies have not yet proven a connection with abortion and .

Studies are being conducted to discover if diet can be an influence for risks. A beta-carotene rich diet, according to studies, may reduce the risk for .

Environmental concerns have not been linked to . Studies indicate environmental exposures such as chemicals, metals, dust, and pollution have not shown a risk increase for .

Statins are cholesterol lowering drugs. Studies have not indicated that statins have any effect on risks for developing .

It has been shown in studies that smoking does not contribute to a woman’s risk of . Second hand smoke also the studies indicate does not affect the risk for .
There are many known factors that place women at risk for developing . Women need to educate themselves as to what the risk factors for are and what preventive actions may be taken in order to decrease the number of women who lose their lives to each year.

For additional information about other cancer topics, please go to womens-health-talk.com/ Women’s Health Talk.

Tags: , , ,

Related posts

Tags: , , ,

Fat Has Long Been Known As One Of The Evil Elements In Breast Cancer

October 23rd, 2008 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

Research has shown that too much fat in the fodder cup increases the tumor risk. In addition, international comparative studies stated, where greater amounts of fat were consumed, cases rose.

The quality of the results of these comparative studies does not leave much to the imagination. They are based on agricultural production numbers and state nothing about the fat consumption of individual persons.

Besides societies differ, where there is little fat eaten as in traditional Japanese rural regions or in Africa as compared to our prosperous western societies that it is impossible to link back the different diseases such as to only a meal or to an individual material like fat.

Take young African women who get their periods later than western females, but they bear their first child in earlier years and have far more children. Each of these factors reduces the statistical risk for .

The latest and more methodical studies in which women who consumed a great deal of food but with little fat were compared directly with each another. The results did not provide any proven evidence that vouches for the fact that any one different source of fat was worse or better than the other.

It did not play a role whether the fat was of animal or vegetable origin and whether it predominantly consisted of unsaturated fatty acids.

As promotions advertize a bad nutrition is also regarded as too many calories, too much fat, alcohol and meat. On the other hand a low fat food diet is better for the chest and rich in base materials, vegetables, fruit, anti-oxidants and vitamins.

But how well are these statements proven by scientific investigations?

In laboratories it has been proven that mice set on half rations of food live longer and rarely get cancer. So do women who want to protect themselves against have to do likewise?

It is advised that it would not be beneficial for women to go on these stringent diets because first of all observation studies of humans did not result in a connection between the calorie admission and the risk of . Secondly from experience it shows that humans who are constantly dieting on and off tend to put on weight rather than become thinner.

Nevertheless there is an indirect effect of our western way of life on the risk of . Our children mature exceedingly faster especially the females who are becoming sexually ripe earlier. Statistically this earlier stage of development is accompanied with an increase in .

Also the connection between the predominance of is far less clear, than what has been studied and read in technical literature. The data shows that years ago chubby women seemed to be protected against chest tumors. Past statistics have shown this.

Past published studies showed an increase in weight did not result in a higher risk of getting this form of . These extra pounds of body weight actually help protect against Osteoporosis, the fearful decalcifying of the bones.

With the rising consumption of meat about half of the studies published so far have not resulted in an increased risk of , the other half were undecided which is possibly explained by the fact that there are some women who have sensitive reactions to meat

The women with sensitive reactions showed certain characteristics in their hereditary factors, which are presently being intensively investigated. Which leads to a possible concern as to the benefit of meat. It is important to know that the questionable substances develop particularly with well done meat. In addition these reactions can be further intensified to a minimum by meat spices such as Thyme, Mint and Mustard.

As far as alcohol goes most studies found an increase of the risk of , some starting from a drink per day. However the aggravation of risk was only slight. While alcohol is not favorably healthy in larger quantities, the benefits of alcohol in moderation must be taken in to account. Such as its favorable effect on the cardiovascular system, a moderate consumption of alcohol in the second part of life accompanies clearly with decreased cardiac problems and impacts disease accumulation risk with a higher life expectancy!

Fruit and vegetables are healthy, but consuming a large amount of vegetables and fruits, do not however automatically offer a higher protection from . Several large studies could not provide any proof of a special protective effect by a high fruit and vegetable consumption. However that in no way diminishes the importance of fruit and vegetables as part of a healthy nutrition!

The same with vitamins like anti-oxidants, vitamin E, C and A, whilst good for you there is no undisputable evidence that vitamins can reduce the risk of . References have been made that Vitamin E and C can actually help enrich the tumor helping it to protect itself against the medicines meant to destroy it.

A possible exception concerns a Vitamin of the B-group. Whether it is really useful however will only be shown through future studies as more data is collected and recommendations made.

Beside Vitamin and mineral supplements vegetables contain secondary plant compounds that could be helpful. Among these substances for example ranked highly is Flavonoid (group of antioxidant chemical compounds) and Phytoestrogens (compounds that occur naturally in plants).

Therefore they are at present investigated intensively with laboratory and animal experiments as well as a set of human observation studies pointed towards the chest-protecting effect of Phytoestrogens.

Before purposeful nourishing recommendations can be given, the researchers must however still clarify how the processing of the food affects the effect of these substances.

Still with all the existing knowledge gaps it can safely be said that there is no Diet or food form which can heal cancer.

J. Stone writes exclusively for cancer-treatment-help.com
cancer-treatment-help.com cancer-treatment-help.com

Tags:

Related posts

Tags: