Home     Log in

Archive for August, 2008

One Voice, One Hand, One Heart

August 31st, 2008 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

SUPPORTING A CAUSE… JUST BECAUSE

It’s a good thing to do!

This week a friend is having a “Mystery Auction” on eBay with
100% of the proceeds being donated to the American Breast Cancer Foundation.

I see this as an act of love and compassion – started by one caring person and others joining in to support her! The Kool In Pink Gang was formed: Many people = One voice, One hand, One heart to support the American Breast Cancer Foundation.

This auction started out as whim to make a Pink Thong for a male blogger, and many of eBay’s finest sellers joined forces and donated PINK items to be included in this auction.
As this whim picked up steam and really got moving, it was decided that the charity auction would be for the American Breast Cancer Foundation.

So far the auction has 42 watchers, 25 bids, and the bidding is up to $230.04.

On a personal note, the eBay seller for this auction, has a dear friend who has and is now in Stage IV.

I’ve got to tell you, the strength of character and unconditional love shown by this seller to her friend is overwhelming and contagious!

Please join me in watching this auction, bidding on it if you can, but most of all help me get the word out about the American Breast Cancer Foundation.

Here’s a link to the auction. Please drop in and watch it or bid if you can!

cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300130133331 cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300130133331

Tags:

Related posts

Tags:

Breast Cancer Risks Experts Dismiss as Unproven

August 31st, 2008 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

A great stir was caused by the recent statement by Sheryl Crow on national television that a doctor told her that women should not drink bottled water that has been left in a car, because the heat causes toxins from the plastic to leak into the water. She also said the doctor told her that the chemicals have been found in breast tissue and these chemicals can lead to .

Articles on the Internet referenced the websites of organizations that had previously addressed this concern, including Breastcancer.org and Plasticsmythbusters.org, which is affiliated with the American Chemistry Council. Both organizations considered the connection between plastic water bottles and risk to be “an urban myth” and say the theory is unproven.

The fact that a direct causal connection has not yet been proven beyond a shred of doubt does not mean that the theory is a myth.

It has been proven that phthalates, which are compounds used as softeners and plasticizers for products made with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) accelerate breast cell growth in animal studies. These chemicals have also been found to adversely affect the reproductive and endocrine system, especially in baby boys. In a recent study, phthalates were recently linked to low testosterone levels which appears to cause increased belly fat and pre-diabetes in men.

These softeners and plasticizers are used in a variety of consumer and personal care products including food packaging materials, toys, and medical/pharmaceutical devices and drugs. The most commonly used phthalate is DEHP. Food contamination has definitely been found to occur when plastic food packaging materials are made from PVC that was treated with phthalates.
As a general rule, we should not cook or heat foods in most plastics. This caveat is especially applicable to old plastic containers in which the surface is eroding the concern being based upon the fact that plasticizers are released during heating. Not all plastic containers are microwaveable. Look for directions regarding this on the packaging.

According to a panel doctor on Breastcancer.org, scientists make sure that during animal studies they don’t contaminate experiments with plastics by using old plastic equipment that have been used and washed many times. Don’t you think you should be a little more concern about contaminating your body?
It is possible that water left in the car where the temperature can almost reach the boiling point may be cause for similar concern. It may not be one incident of drinking water from a heated plastic bottle that leads to increased , but an accumulation of several risky behaviors or exposure related to plastics just may promote cancer.

We don’t know definitively all the causes of cancer, but we are exposed to so many possible agents that may contribute to cancer, some of them are naturally occurring and some are man-made that there will never be ample epidemiological human studies or data that prove or disprove these “myths.” Some of these agents may not directly cause cancer alone, but they can cause direct damage to genes or disrupt the immune system or alter the hormone balance in such a way as to create a fertile environment for cancer cells to grow.

Another of these “myths” that have circulated on the Internet for several years is that using underarm deodorants or antiperspirants that contain parabens can cause . And the consensus among scientists is there is no connection between antiperspirants and .

Nevertheless, researchers found six different kinds of parabens in the tissue samples of women who were being treated for . All of the samples contained some parabens. The amount of parabens in the samples was about equal to the amount that had caused cells to grow in test tubes in earlier studies.

The researchers concluded that these chemicals enter breast tissue from outside sources and accumulate in levels high enough to trigger the growth of cells. Parabens are also used to preserve foods, medicines, and cosmetics. So there are lots of opportunities for exposure to these chemicals.

Another contributor to was recently reported in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Cadmium, a toxic heavy metal that can build up in the body over time was linked to increased risk.

Researchers measured cadmium levels in the urine samples from a group of women and found that women with the highest cadmium levels had twice the risk of those with the lowest levels.
People may be exposed to cadmium from tobacco smoke and some foods such as liver, kidney, crustaceans (lobsters, crabs, and shrimp), and canned fish. People who work with cadmium or in refining and smelting are also exposed, but the U.S. government limits such on-the-job exposure.
But once again, we have the usual disclaimer: “The study doesn’t prove cadmium exposure causes . It will take more research to figure that out.”

There will never be ample animal studies, much less human epidemiological data that prove or disprove definitively that any specific product or chemicals cause in humans. I think it is wise to avoid suspect materials whenever possible. There is usually enough data to conclude whether or not a substance presents a risk that is harmful to your health and may contribute to .

Many of these suspect chemicals do not affect only risk; they are frequently harmful to the cardiovascular system and overall health.

Consumer reaction that should result if the available data were widely publicized could force consumer product manufacturers and food packagers to search for alternatives.

Syble James is President of Alpha Health Source, online at AlphaHealthSource.net AlphaHealthSource.net, where visitors can find supplements, weight-loss programs, body care, organic and natural foods and beverages, and request consultations. Ms. James also researches, writes and consults on VMS, weight loss, health clubs, nutraceuticals, foods, beverages and MLM (supplements and body care) within the investment and fitness industry sectors. She can be reached at Syble.James@AlphaHealthSource.net or 1-800-899-0799.

Tags: ,

Related posts

Tags: ,

Tamoxifen and Breast Cancer

August 31st, 2008 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

A number of cells in the female body contain receptors for estrogen and estrogen-like substances. Examples of these organs are the breast, uterus, vagina, skin, ovaries and brain. Estrogen binds to receptors on breast cells and stimulates them to divide and replicate. This mechanism, on the other hand is turned off by Tamoxifen as it attaches to the estrogen receptors in the cell surface. With cells that contain estrogen receptors, Tamoxifen sends these cells into a programmed cell death cycle known as apoptosis.

Tamoxifen is orally administered just like other hormones. Aside from rendering cells into apoptosis, it also acts like estrogen on other tissues and has a positive effect on bone metabolism. Tamoxifen, in comparison to estrogen, stimulates the uterine lining more and both substances are equally effective in retaining bone calcium.

Several studies have shown that Tamoxifen increases the cure rate of women with non-invasive , but is still controversial in its clinical use. The controversy lies on a recent clinical trial, which aimed to determine if Tamoxifen was effective in primary prophylaxis in high risk asymptomatic women. At the end of the trial, Tamoxifen was dealt with severe scrutiny and a large amount of negative press overstating its potential adverse effects for asymptomatic women. There is, indeed, no question that Tamoxifen is an extremely potent drug in the treatment of patients. Based on the results of another clinical trial involving the use of Tamoxifen, treatment duration plays a significant role in drug treatment outcome. This clinical trial compared five years versus ten years of using Tamoxifen after the diagnosis of . The trial showed that five years of taking Tamoxifen significantly diminished the systemic recurrence of . On the other hand, an additional five years added only expense and potential risk of uterus cancer with no additional benefits in cure rate. Not all breast cancers, however, respond to Tamoxifen treatment. Response rate to Tamoxifen varies upon the abundance of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the primary cancer.

Since breast cancers are very heterogeneous, they do not develop in the same cellular way. About 60 percent of breast cancers contain estrogen and progesterone receptors, while others contain less. Tamoxifen appears to be more effective in women who have more of these hormone receptors in their tumors than those who do not. On the other hand, within a given , there may be cells that have more hormone receptors than others do. Hence, the effect of Tamoxifen on these conditions varies. It is also possible that over time, cells that are hormone receptor positive may evolve and may not contain hormone receptors anymore. This may explain why women who receive a combination treatment of Tamoxifen and may have a better response to treatment than with either therapy given alone. In most cases, when and Tamoxifen are given in a , they are given sequentially; initially, is given to destroy hormone receptor negative cells and then followed by Tamoxifen, which can then act on hormone receptor positive cells that may be less susceptible to chemotherapeutic drugs.

In a few cases, perimenopausal women seem to have a difficulty with Tamoxifen use. Most premenopausal women in their 30s and 40s almost have no adverse effects with Tamoxifen and older women who are not in hormone replacement have little problem with Tamoxifen treatment.

The major side effect of Tamoxifen is uterine toxicity. Some women taking the drug have endometrial thickening, a stimulation of the glandular lining of the uterus, which can become cancerous if left unnoticed. The chance of developing uterine cancer as a result of Tamoxifen use is quite small, only about one percent. Nevertheless, the uterus must be monitored carefully with either an ultrasound or endometrial biopsy during the patient’s annual pelvic examination if she is taking this drug.

Tamoxifen was the first selective estrogen receptor modulator developed and has been used for over 20 years. Recently, several other drugs of this class have been released and more are presently undergoing development. The goal is to develop the “perfect” drug in this class that prevents without stimulating the uterus, is beneficial to the skeletal system and is good for lipid metabolism with as minimal side effects as possible. The perfect selective estrogen receptor modulator should also be an excellent hormone replacement agent for women entering menopause.

Michael Russell

Your Independent guide to breast-cancer.treatment-and-guides.com/ Breast Cancer

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Tags: , ,

Glycemic Advantage & Good Carbs - Cancer Prevention and Treatment Support

August 31st, 2008 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

The Glycemic Index is a concept recognized by the World Health Organization. It measures the type of carbohydrates you eat and how that affects your blood sugar levels. Complex carbohydrates that break down slowly rate well or “low” on the Glycemic Index. On the other hand, simple carbohydrates (like common sugar) rate higher because they break down too quickly and cause your insulin levels to rise quickly. This leads to increased fat storage while also leaving you hungry soon after a meal. It’s the difference between “good” carbs and “bad” carbs. Recent medical publications support the idea that a high glycemic index diet increases risk for at least endometrial, ovarian and colorectal cancers. Is monitoring your diet for Low Glycemic Index important during treatment as well?

First of all a low glycemic, “good carbs”, low fat diet combined with optimal amounts of protein and fiber is generally regarded as a healthy diet which is at the very least “heart healthy”. Based on complementary medicine evidence it is also the optimal immune potentiating combination of foods. In that regard, although it is not a substitute or alternative treatment for ANY cancer, this Low Glycemic Index dietary approach is certainly a very reasonable complementary strategy during treatment or recovery. Thus in addition to a “preventive” strategy for cancer, the idea can be applied to prevention of recurrence as well.

There are several points regarding a Low Glycemic Index diet and cancer that are important to discuss. First of all, the concept that sugar preferentially “feeds” cancer is more of a myth than reality. Sugar “feeds” all of our cells, so it does not discriminate, although there are some alternative viewpoints out there that tie high glycemic index foods and insulin response to worse outcomes. This is a grey area as far as solid evidence is concerned. However, a very important point is that some people may confuse “carbohydrates” with “sugar” and cut out ALL carbohydrates from their diet. This is a BIG mistake!! It is true that sugar is a simple carbohydrate, and one that has a high glycemic index. But complex carbohydrates such as legumes, vegetables, whole grains and fruits are generally low glycemic index foods rich in nutrients that are extremely important in nutritional support. Think of this as being similar to “bad fats” and “good fats”. Everyone needs some good fats to maintain normal physiology. Similarly, good carbs are also critical.

There are numerous books and papers on this topic. If you do not have time to look all the details up regarding what to eat or what to avoid, consider some name brand reputable companies that have made a science of combining the right foods to create a low glycemic diet that is healthy and very palatable. Find out more by visiting gyncancerdoctor.com” target=”_blank GynCancerDoctor.com

As always, any substantial dietary modifications should be discussed with your treating physician(s)!!

Steven A. Vasilev MD,MBA,FACOG,FACS is a fellowship trained and board certified gynecologic oncologist, which means he is specially trained and certified to take care of women with gynecologic cancers using a broad spectrum of skills. He has practiced at academic as well as private centers, has been on the faculty of three universities and continues to be involved in research and education. You can visit gyncancerdoctor.com gyncancerdoctor.com to learn more about screening, prevention and treatment of gynecologic cancers. You can also visit a one-of-a-kind site devoted to life, love and intimacy after cancer cancervival.com cancervival.com

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Tags: , ,

Peritoneal Mesothelioma Survival Rates

August 30th, 2008 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

Peritoneal Mesothelioma is a cancer of the abdomen lining caused due to prolonged exposure to asbestos. Thousands of lawsuits are handled every year dealing with the issue of peritoneal and its effects. Symptoms of may not appear until 30 to 50 years after exposure to asbestos. Shortness of breath and pain in the chest due to an accumulation of fluid in the pleural space are often symptoms of pleural Other symptoms of peritoneal include loss of appetite, nausea, and abdominal swelling. Fluid commonly accumulates in the abdominal cavity causing the swelling and pain. The symptoms can become quite serous over time, as the swelling will exert great force on surrounding organs and lead to great pain.

If diagnosed at an early stage, than there are chances of survival, depending upon on how advanced the cancer is at the time of the diagnosis. Treatment with radiation or and early diagnosis can be of great help. In fact, these treatments can help a patient to survive for a long time. It is often true that if the cancer is found early and treated aggressively, almost half of the patients whose cancer is found early reach the two-year mark and about 20% survive five years. For peritoneal , patients are often informed that they won’t be able to live for more than one year. But peritoneal specialists, working in leading cancer centers throughout the world, often report better statistics than this, based upon the clinical trials that they are carrying out.

e-peritonealmesothelioma.com Peritoneal Mesothelioma provides detailed information on peritoneal , peritoneal treatment, peritoneal lawyers, peritoneal survival rates and more. Peritoneal Mesothelioma is affiliated with e-pleuralmesothelioma.com Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Tags: , ,